![]() It is more of a race condition, although I haven't heard it referred to like that before. Collisions are the result of a shared electrical bus. authorization.ģ) Duplicate MACs will not cause collisions. They are similar but the difference is important look up authentication vs. The port security feature of some switches is different that "deauthentication"- it is deauthorization. You mentioned deauthentication in your question. Then, if the switch receives frames from a duplicate MAC on another switchport, it can place that port into a disabled state (shut it down.) The MAC address will be learned dynamically by the switch (like it usually learns MACs), but the difference is that once it is learned, it is bound to that switchport. ![]() If you want to use port security options on a managed switch, you can do stuff like only allow 1 MAC address per switchport. Managed switches will give you a warning printed in the console terminal if they detect a duplicate MAC (a MAC that 'exists' on multiple switchports), but by default they won't "do anything" about it AFAIK. Duplicate MAC addresses will not trigger any sort of security problem in an unmanaged switch (a switch without configuration software), or a managed switch (like most Cisco/HP/Junipers) that has not been configured for port security. The reachability of either host will flap on and off and be inconsistent.Ģ) Short answer: no. So if there are two hosts, both with the same MAC address, then the switch will update it's MAC table every time it receives a frame from either host. ![]() Upon receiving any frame, the source MAC is read and compared with the current switching table, and then added alongside whichever switchport it was received on. It bases this table on the source address of frames it receives during the normal operation of the network. So,ġ) In general, an Ethernet switch keeps a table of which MAC addresses are attached to which ports. It's possible for two hosts to have the same MAC, due to spoofing, a mistake during manufacturing, or willful negligence on the part of the manufacturer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |